> jer...@marvell.com
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce copy_field rte flow action
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 19:06
> > To: Alexander Kozyrev
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiien
com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce copy_field rte flow action
>
> 07/01/2021 17:57, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > 07/01/2021 16:22, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > 07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > > > > > Thursday,
07/01/2021 21:14, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > 07/01/2021 17:57, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > 07/01/2021 16:22, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > > 07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > > > > > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:18, Thomas Monjalon
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > RTE Flows API lacks the
> 07/01/2021 17:57, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > 07/01/2021 16:22, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > 07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > > > > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:18, Thomas Monjalon
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header
> > > > > >
07/01/2021 17:57, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > 07/01/2021 16:22, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > 07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > > > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:18, Thomas Monjalon
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header
> > > > > > > > > field
> 07/01/2021 16:22, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > 07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:18, Thomas Monjalon
> > >
> > > > > > > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header
> > > > > > > > field in
> > > > > > > > order to use it later for adv
07/01/2021 16:22, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > 07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:18, Thomas Monjalon
> >
> > > > > > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > order to use it later for advanced packet m
> 07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:18, Thomas Monjalon
>
> > > > > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
> > > > > > order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
> > > > > > include the usage of VxLAN
07/01/2021 16:10, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:07, Thomas Monjalon
> > > > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
> > > > > order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
> > > > > include the usage of VxLAN ID after the
> > > Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:07, Thomas Monjalon
> > > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
> > > > order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
> > > > include the usage of VxLAN ID after the packet is decapsulated or
> > > > storing th
07/01/2021 15:17, Alexander Kozyrev:
> > Tuesday, January 5, 2021 17:17, Thomas Monjalon
> > > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
> > > order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
> > > include the usage of VxLAN ID after the packet is decaps
> Tuesday, January 5, 2021 17:17, Thomas Monjalon
> > RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
> > order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
> > include the usage of VxLAN ID after the packet is decapsulated or
> > storing this ID inside the pack
05/01/2021 23:12, Alexander Kozyrev:
> Happy New Year Gentlemen, would you mind to share your thought on the
> proposed changes?
> I was thinking about renaming it to more general "copy item" to cover all
> packet fields, tags and metadata.
> Other than that it is ready for a formal patch integr
18/12/2020 02:31, Alexander Kozyrev:
> RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
> order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
> include the usage of VxLAN ID after the packet is decapsulated or
> storing this ID inside the packet payload itself or s
ybche...@oktetlabs.ru
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce copy_field rte flow action
>
> RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
> order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
> include the usage of VxLAN ID after the pack
RTE Flows API lacks the ability to save an arbitrary header field in
order to use it later for advanced packet manipulations. Examples
include the usage of VxLAN ID after the packet is decapsulated or
storing this ID inside the packet payload itself or swapping an
arbitrary inner and outer packet f
16 matches
Mail list logo