Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-06-08 Thread Thomas Monjalon
17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > Since DPDK developers have decided to use a different tag format > than the kernel developers, ignore warnings about SPDX tags. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Applied, thanks

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-19 Thread Hemant Agrawal
> 18/04/2018 10:56, Bruce Richardson: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:19:07AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 18/04/2018 00:11, Scott Branden: > > > > On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > > > > >> IMHO would have been better to use the ke

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 18/04/2018 10:56, Bruce Richardson: >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:19:07AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 18/04/2018 00:11, Scott Branden: On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: >>>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/04/2018 10:56, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:19:07AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 18/04/2018 00:11, Scott Branden: > > > On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > > > >> IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX sty

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:49:07AM +, Kuusisaari, Juhamatti wrote: > > Hello, > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:19:07AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 18/04/2018 00:11, Scott Branden: > > > > On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-18 Thread Kuusisaari, Juhamatti
Hello, > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:19:07AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 18/04/2018 00:11, Scott Branden: > > > On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > > > >> IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and keep > > > >> the ch

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:19:07AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 18/04/2018 00:11, Scott Branden: > > On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > > >> IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and > > >> keep the check but that appears

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-17 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/04/2018 00:11, Scott Branden: > On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > >> IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and > >> keep the check but that appears to be a minority opinion. > > > > I think it is better to work on checkpat

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-17 Thread Scott Branden
On 18-04-17 03:06 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and keep the check but that appears to be a minority opinion. I think it is better to work on checkpatch itself. When defining our SPDX style, Linux one w

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-17 Thread Thomas Monjalon
17/04/2018 23:49, Stephen Hemminger: > IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and > keep the check but that appears to be a minority opinion. I think it is better to work on checkpatch itself. When defining our SPDX style, Linux one was not definitive. Do you think we can ask the

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format

2018-04-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Since DPDK developers have decided to use a different tag format than the kernel developers, ignore warnings about SPDX tags. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and keep the check but that appears to be a minority opinion. devtools/chec