On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:13:31PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-06-26 10:30, Neil Horman:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2015-06-25 10:35, Neil Horman:
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL
> > > > + * If a function has been bifurcated into mu
2015-06-26 10:30, Neil Horman:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-06-25 10:35, Neil Horman:
> > > +/*
> > > + * MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL
> > > + * If a function has been bifurcated into multiple versions, none of
> > > which
> > > + * are defined as the exported s
2015-06-25 10:35, Neil Horman:
> +/*
> + * MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL
> + * If a function has been bifurcated into multiple versions, none of which
> + * are defined as the exported symbol name in the map file, this macro can be
> + * used to alias a specific version of the symbol to its exported name. For
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-06-25 10:35, Neil Horman:
> > +/*
> > + * MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL
> > + * If a function has been bifurcated into multiple versions, none of which
> > + * are defined as the exported symbol name in the map file, this macro can
> > be
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 4:36 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 2/3] rte_compat: Add MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL
> macro
>
> It was pointed out in my ex
It was pointed out in my examples that doing shared library symbol versioning by
partitioning symbols to version specific functions (as opposed to leaving the
latest symol version at the base symbol name), neglects to take into account
static builds. Add a macro to handle that. If you choose a ve
6 matches
Mail list logo