Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 10:07 AM
> To: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> Cc: Olivier Matz ; dev@dpdk.org; nd
> ; jer...@marvell.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com;
> nipun.gu...@nxp.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> ; i.maxim...@samsung.co
16/07/2019 16:03, Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China):
> From: Olivier Matz
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:54:36PM +0800, Gavin Hu wrote:
> > > > Currently, the flush is done by dequeuing the ring in a while loop. It
> > > > is
> > >
Hi Olivier, Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 6:32 AM
> To: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; tho...@monjalon.net;
> jer...@marvell.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; nipun.gu...@nxp.com;
> Honnappa Nagarahalli ;
> i.maxim.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:01:21AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:54:36PM +0800, Gavin Hu wrote:
> > Currently, the flush is done by dequeuing the ring in a while loop. It is
> > much simpler to flush the queue by resetting the head and tail indices.
> >
> > Fixes: af75078
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:54:36PM +0800, Gavin Hu wrote:
> Currently, the flush is done by dequeuing the ring in a while loop. It is
> much simpler to flush the queue by resetting the head and tail indices.
>
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by:
Currently, the flush is done by dequeuing the ring in a while loop. It is
much simpler to flush the queue by resetting the head and tail indices.
Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
6 matches
Mail list logo
