21/07/2020 14:51, Parav Pandit:
>
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 5:57 PM
> >
> > 21/07/2020 14:13, Parav Pandit:
> > > From: David Marchand
> > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM Parav Pandit
> > wrote:
> > > > > > This way, net/mlx5 and vdpa/mlx5 will pass their i
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 5:57 PM
>
> 21/07/2020 14:13, Parav Pandit:
> > From: David Marchand
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM Parav Pandit
> wrote:
> > > > > This way, net/mlx5 and vdpa/mlx5 will pass their id_map to the
> > > > > mlx5 pci driver whether i
21/07/2020 14:13, Parav Pandit:
> From: David Marchand
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > This way, net/mlx5 and vdpa/mlx5 will pass their id_map to the mlx5
> > > > pci driver whether it is registered to the pci bus or not yet.
> > >
> > > And here pci_id_table will
> From: David Marchand
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 4:59 PM
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > This way, net/mlx5 and vdpa/mlx5 will pass their id_map to the mlx5
> > > pci driver whether it is registered to the pci bus or not yet.
> >
> > And here pci_id_table wil
21/07/2020 13:29, David Marchand:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM Parav Pandit wrote:
> > Basically mlx5_pci_bus, mlx5_net and mlx5_vdpa will be called with same
> > priority RTE_PRIO_LAST.
> > driver id table and drv_flags dynamically updated as PMDs register.
> >
> > Should we have another API
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM Parav Pandit wrote:
> > This way, net/mlx5 and vdpa/mlx5 will pass their id_map to the mlx5
> > pci driver whether it is registered to the pci bus or not yet.
>
> And here pci_id_table will not be const *.
> Is that ok?
This is already the case in the current patch
Hi David,
On 7/21/2020 3:04 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:30 PM Ori Kam wrote:
>>> net and vdpa code expect the common code being initialised.
>>> It is a dependency internal to mlx5 drivers, I see nothing generic.
>>>
>> First the idea was to declare a new bus not a PMD.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:30 PM Ori Kam wrote:
> > net and vdpa code expect the common code being initialised.
> > It is a dependency internal to mlx5 drivers, I see nothing generic.
> >
> First the idea was to declare a new bus not a PMD.
> The issue is not from common code but from loading more
Hi David,
> -Original Message-
> From: David Marchand
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:48 PM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> >
> > 20/07/2020 18:21, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
> > > > common code
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
>
> On 7/20/2020 6:26 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit
> >> On 7/20/2020 5:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 20/07/2020 18:21, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:48 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 20/07/2020 18:21, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
> > > common code before initializing the PMD.
> > > However mlx5_common is not really a class, it
On 7/20/2020 6:26 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> Hi
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ferruh Yigit
>> On 7/20/2020 5:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 20/07/2020 18:21, Ferruh Yigit:
On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
> co
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> On 7/20/2020 5:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 20/07/2020 18:21, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >>> Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
> >>> common code before initializing the PMD.
> >>>
On 7/20/2020 5:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 20/07/2020 18:21, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>> Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
>>> common code before initializing the PMD.
>>> However mlx5_common is not really a class, it is the pre-initializ
20/07/2020 18:21, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
> > common code before initializing the PMD.
> > However mlx5_common is not really a class, it is the pre-initialization
> > code needed for the PMDs.
> >
> > In
On 7/17/2020 2:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
> common code before initializing the PMD.
> However mlx5_common is not really a class, it is the pre-initialization
> code needed for the PMDs.
>
> In subsequent patch a needed initialization seque
Currently mlx5_common uses CLASS priority to initialize
common code before initializing the PMD.
However mlx5_common is not really a class, it is the pre-initialization
code needed for the PMDs.
In subsequent patch a needed initialization sequence is:
(a) Initialize bus (say pci)
(b) Initialize co
17 matches
Mail list logo
