Hi Thomas, Michael,
> > Hi, Bernard
> >
> > Could we merge some patch together? I see lots of patches are simple
> > and doing the same thing but in different NIC, merge them almost have
> > no affect of review, what's more it will make reviewers more
> > comfortable with less and simple patches
2015-11-02 05:28, Qiu, Michael:
> Hi, Bernard
>
> Could we merge some patch together? I see lots of patches are simple and
> doing the same thing but in different NIC, merge them almost have no
> affect of review, what's more it will make reviewers more comfortable
> with less and simple patches.
Hi, Bernard
Could we merge some patch together? I see lots of patches are simple and
doing the same thing but in different NIC, merge them almost have no
affect of review, what's more it will make reviewers more comfortable
with less and simple patches.
Then we could have a clean patch set with a
2015-10-30 15:08, Bernard Iremonger:
> Changes in v7:
> rebase to latest code.
Please Bernard, be kind and change the status of your previous patchset.
I'm tired to do it for 28 patches each time you rebase.
By the way, it is not needed to do a patch per driver when it is the
same oneliner without
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 3:22 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/28] remove pci driver from vdevs
>
> 2
There is a dummy pci driver in the vdev PMD's at present.
This patch set removes the pci driver from the vdev PMD's.
Changes have been made to librte_ether to handle vdevs and pdevs in the same
way.
The following vdev PMD's have had the pci driver removed:
null
ring
bonding
pcap
af_packet
xenvir
6 matches
Mail list logo
