[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/13] vhost: add API bind a virtq to a specific core

2015-10-20 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:16:23AM +, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 10/9/2015 1:46 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > From: Changchun Ouyang > > > > The new API rte_vhost_core_id_set() is to bind a virtq to a specific > > core, while the another API rte_vhost_core_id_get() is for getting > > the bind core f

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/13] vhost: add API bind a virtq to a specific core

2015-10-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-20 14:25, Yuanhan Liu: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:16:23AM +, Xie, Huawei wrote: > > On 10/9/2015 1:46 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > > From: Changchun Ouyang > > > > > > The new API rte_vhost_core_id_set() is to bind a virtq to a specific > > > core, while the another API rte_vhost_core_

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/13] vhost: add API bind a virtq to a specific core

2015-10-20 Thread Xie, Huawei
On 10/9/2015 1:46 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > From: Changchun Ouyang > > The new API rte_vhost_core_id_set() is to bind a virtq to a specific > core, while the another API rte_vhost_core_id_get() is for getting > the bind core for a virtq. Where is the absolute necessity to put switching/application

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/13] vhost: add API bind a virtq to a specific core

2015-10-09 Thread Yuanhan Liu
From: Changchun Ouyang The new API rte_vhost_core_id_set() is to bind a virtq to a specific core, while the another API rte_vhost_core_id_get() is for getting the bind core for a virtq. The usage, which will be introduced soon, could be find at examles/vhost/main.c. Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouy