Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model

2017-01-05 Thread Shreyansh Jain
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 03:52 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 2016-12-26 18:53, Shreyansh Jain: Link to v1: [10] Link to v2: [11] Link to v3: [13] Link to v4: [14] :: Introduction :: DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the design of device tree (or list) within

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model

2017-01-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-26 18:53, Shreyansh Jain: > Link to v1: [10] > Link to v2: [11] > Link to v3: [13] > Link to v4: [14] > > :: Introduction :: > > DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the > design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A > non-PCI device d

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model

2016-12-26 Thread Shreyansh Jain
Link to v1: [10] Link to v2: [11] Link to v3: [13] Link to v4: [14] :: Introduction :: DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A non-PCI device doesn't have a way of being expressed without using hoo