, 2021 4:39 PM
>>>> To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf
>>>> Penso
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction
>>>> representor
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/21 5:31 P
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrew Rybchenko
>Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 3:35 PM
>To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>; Thomas Monjalon
>
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction representor
>
On 2/4/21 5:15 PM, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Rybchenko
>> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:39 PM
>> To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-de
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrew Rybchenko
>Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:39 PM
>To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction representor
>
>On 1/28/21 5:31 P
On 1/28/21 5:31 PM, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote:
>
>>> The patch of device SF capability, but seems I misunderstood your
>>> suggestion.
>>> Let me explain process to create a SF:
>>> 1. SF can be created on the fly with scripts, unlike VF which is statically
>>> pre-created.
>>
>> Is there a maxim
>> The patch of device SF capability, but seems I misunderstood your suggestion.
>> Let me explain process to create a SF:
>> 1. SF can be created on the fly with scripts, unlike VF which is statically
>> pre-created.
>
>Is there a maximum index and maximum total number of SF's created? How to fi
Hi Ajit,
>-Original Message-
>From: Ajit Khaparde
>Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 1:43 AM
>To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>Cc: Andrew Rybchenko ; dev@dpdk.org;
>Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction
>repre
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:05 PM Xueming(Steven) Li wrote:
>
[snip]
> The patch of device SF capability, but seems I misunderstood your suggestion.
> Let me explain process to create a SF:
> 1. SF can be created on the fly with scripts, unlike VF which is statically
> pre-created.
> 2. SF
4:41 PM
>>>> To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf
>>>> Penso
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction
>>>> representor
>>>>
>>>> On 1/19/21 10:13 AM, Xu
Hi Andrew,
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrew Rybchenko
>Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 4:21 PM
>To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction
>representor
>
>On 1
On 1/19/21 5:24 PM, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Rybchenko
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 4:41 PM
>> To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>>
>> Subject:
> dedicated queues(txq, rxq). A SF netdev supports E-Switch representation
> offload similar to existing PF and VF representors. A SF shares PCI level
> resources with other SFs and/or with its parent PCI function.
>
> From SmartNIC perspective, when PCI device is shared for multi-host,
> represen
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrew Rybchenko
>Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 4:41 PM
>To: Xueming(Steven) Li
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko ; Asaf Penso
>
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction
>representor
>
>On 1/19
On 1/19/21 10:13 AM, Xueming Li wrote:
> dedicated queues(txq, rxq). A SF netdev supports E-Switch representation
> offload similar to existing PF and VF representors. A SF shares PCI
> level resources with other SFs and/or with its parent PCI function.
>
>>From SmartNIC perspective, when PCI devi
dedicated queues(txq, rxq). A SF netdev supports E-Switch representation
offload similar to existing PF and VF representors. A SF shares PCI
level resources with other SFs and/or with its parent PCI function.
>From SmartNIC perspective, when PCI device is shared for multi-host,
representors for ho
15 matches
Mail list logo
