Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-29 Thread santosh
On Friday 29 September 2017 12:23 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:20AM +0100, santosh wrote: >> Hi Olivier, >> >> >> On Friday 29 September 2017 09:32 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:52:31PM +0100, santosh wrote: Hi Olivier, On Mon

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-29 Thread Olivier MATZ
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:20AM +0100, santosh wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > > On Friday 29 September 2017 09:32 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:52:31PM +0100, santosh wrote: > >> Hi Olivier, > >> > >> > >> On Monday 25 September 2017 08:37 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > >> >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-29 Thread santosh
On Friday 29 September 2017 11:16 AM, santosh wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > > On Friday 29 September 2017 09:32 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:52:31PM +0100, santosh wrote: >>> Hi Olivier, >>> >>> >>> On Monday 25 September 2017 08:37 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: >>> > +{ > +

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-29 Thread santosh
Hi Olivier, On Friday 29 September 2017 09:32 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:52:31PM +0100, santosh wrote: >> Hi Olivier, >> >> >> On Monday 25 September 2017 08:37 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: >> +{ + struct rte_eth_dev *dev; + const char *tmp; + + RT

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-29 Thread Olivier MATZ
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:52:31PM +0100, santosh wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > > On Monday 25 September 2017 08:37 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:48:37PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > >> Now that dpdk supports more than one mempool drivers and > >> each mempool dr

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-28 Thread santosh
Hi Olivier, On Monday 25 September 2017 10:52 PM, santosh wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > > On Monday 25 September 2017 08:37 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: >>> +{ >>> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev; >>> + const char *tmp; >>> + >>> + RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV); >>> + >>> + if (pool =

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-25 Thread santosh
Hi Olivier, On Monday 25 September 2017 08:37 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:48:37PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> Now that dpdk supports more than one mempool drivers and >> each mempool driver works best for specific PMD, example: >> - sw ring based mempool for I

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-25 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi, On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:48:37PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote: > Now that dpdk supports more than one mempool drivers and > each mempool driver works best for specific PMD, example: > - sw ring based mempool for Intel PMD drivers. > - dpaa2 HW mempool manager for dpaa2 PMD driver. > - fpa HW

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port

2017-09-11 Thread Santosh Shukla
Now that dpdk supports more than one mempool drivers and each mempool driver works best for specific PMD, example: - sw ring based mempool for Intel PMD drivers. - dpaa2 HW mempool manager for dpaa2 PMD driver. - fpa HW mempool manager for Octeontx PMD driver. Application would like to know the be