On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 6:02 PM David Marchand
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:19 PM Radha Mohan wrote:
> > I received this report that this patch failed to apply
> > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-August/211611.html
>
> The two patches of this series are seen as two separat
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:19 PM Radha Mohan wrote:
> I received this report that this patch failed to apply
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-August/211611.html
The two patches of this series are seen as two separate series.
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?submitter=2
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:29 PM Radha Mohan Chintakuntla
wrote:
>
> Removing the rawdev based octeontx2-ep driver as the dependent
> common/octeontx2 will soon be going away. Moreover this driver is no
> longer required as the net/octeontx_ep driver is sufficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radha Mohan Ch
Removing the rawdev based octeontx2-ep driver as the dependent
common/octeontx2 will soon be going away. Moreover this driver is no
longer required as the net/octeontx_ep driver is sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla
---
Changes from v3:
Fixed patch application failure due to conf
4 matches
Mail list logo
