> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 1:13 AM
> To: Liang, Cunming; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/17] eal: fix wrong strnlen() return
> value in
> 32bit icc
>
>
Hi,
On 02/09/2015 12:57 PM, Liang, Cunming wrote:
>>> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ eal_parse_lcores(const char *lcores)
>>> /* Remove all blank characters ahead and after */
>>> while (isblank(*lcores))
>>> lcores++;
>>> - i = strnlen(lcores, sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX));
>>> + i = strnlen
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 4:00 AM
> To: Liang, Cunming; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/17] eal: fix wrong strnlen() return
> value in
> 32bit icc
>
>
Hi,
On 02/02/2015 03:02 AM, Cunming Liang wrote:
> The problem is that strnlen() here may return invalid value with 32bit icc.
> (actually it returns it?s second parameter,e.g: sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX)).
> It starts to manifest hwen max_len parameter is > 2M and using icc ?m32 ?O2
> (or above).
>
>
The problem is that strnlen() here may return invalid value with 32bit icc.
(actually it returns it?s second parameter,e.g: sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX)).
It starts to manifest hwen max_len parameter is > 2M and using icc ?m32 ?O2 (or
above).
Suggested-by: Konstantin Ananyev
Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang
5 matches
Mail list logo
