On 11/3/2017 1:38 AM, Peng, Yuan wrote:
> Tested-by: Peng Yuan
Hi Yuan,
Thanks for the testing.
And related to the "Tested-by" tag, since it has also contains code patchwork
thinks this is a new patch [1].
This both requires someone updating patchwork and mark that patch as invalid,
and since
On 11/3/2017 12:38 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> The action for L2 tunnel should be VF or PF, not QUEUE.
>
> Fixes: 99e7003831c ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter")
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao
> Acked-by: Wei Dai
Tested-by: Yuan Peng
Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 3:39 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Zhao1, Wei
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/ixgbe: fix filter parser error in L2 tunnel
The action for L2 tunnel should be VF or PF, not QUEUE.
Fixes: 99e7003831c ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter")
x309)/Raw('x' *
20)
verify pkt1 to vf0 queue0, pkt2 to vf1 queue0, pkt3 to pf queue 0, pkt4 can't
received by pf and vfs.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 3:39 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Zhao1, Wei
The action for L2 tunnel should be VF or PF, not QUEUE.
Fixes: 99e7003831c ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter")
Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao
Acked-by: Wei Dai
---
v2:
-add vf id check.
v3:
-add action support for PF.
v4:
-fix action type check error
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 29
5 matches
Mail list logo
