>
> On 10/4/2021 10:20 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
>
> > static inline int
> > rte_eth_rx_queue_count(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id)
> > {
> > - struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> > + struct rte_eth_fp_ops *p;
> > + void *qd;
> > +
> >>>
On 10/4/2021 10:20 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
> static inline int
> rte_eth_rx_queue_count(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id)
> {
> - struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> + struct rte_eth_fp_ops *p;
> + void *qd;
> +
> + if (port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS ||
> >>
> >>> static inline int
> >>> rte_eth_rx_queue_count(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id)
> >>> {
> >>> - struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> >>> + struct rte_eth_fp_ops *p;
> >>> + void *qd;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS ||
> >>> + queue_id >= RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_P
On 10/1/2021 6:40 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
>> On 10/1/2021 3:02 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
>>> Rework 'fast' burst functions to use rte_eth_fp_ops[].
>>> While it is an API/ABI breakage, this change is intended to be
>>> transparent for both users (no changes in user app is required)
> On 10/1/2021 3:02 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> > Rework 'fast' burst functions to use rte_eth_fp_ops[].
> > While it is an API/ABI breakage, this change is intended to be
> > transparent for both users (no changes in user app is required) and
> > PMD developers (no changes in PMD is required
On 10/1/2021 3:02 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> Rework 'fast' burst functions to use rte_eth_fp_ops[].
> While it is an API/ABI breakage, this change is intended to be
> transparent for both users (no changes in user app is required) and
> PMD developers (no changes in PMD is required).
> One ext
Rework 'fast' burst functions to use rte_eth_fp_ops[].
While it is an API/ABI breakage, this change is intended to be
transparent for both users (no changes in user app is required) and
PMD developers (no changes in PMD is required).
One extra thing to note - RX/TX callback invocation will cause ex
7 matches
Mail list logo
