[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] use simple zero initializers

2015-04-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > To initialize a structure with zeros, one field was explicitly set > > to avoid "missing initializer" bug with old GCC (e.g. 4.4). > > This warning is now disabled (commit ) for old versions of GCC, > > so the workarounds may be removed. > > > > These initializers should not be needed for stati

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] use simple zero initializers

2015-04-19 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
On 04/17/15 01:10, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > To initialize a structure with zeros, one field was explicitly set > to avoid "missing initializer" bug with old GCC (e.g. 4.4). > This warning is now disabled (commit ) for old versions of GCC, > so the workarounds may be removed. > > These initializer

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] use simple zero initializers

2015-04-17 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:11 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] use simple zero initializers Acked-by: John McNamara

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] use simple zero initializers

2015-04-17 Thread Thomas Monjalon
To initialize a structure with zeros, one field was explicitly set to avoid "missing initializer" bug with old GCC (e.g. 4.4). This warning is now disabled (commit ) for old versions of GCC, so the workarounds may be removed. These initializers should not be needed for static variables but they ar