On 6/28/2018 6:23 AM, Pablo de Lara wrote:
Since asymmetric functionality will be implemented soon,
not all PMDs must support symmetric sessions.
Therefore, a check is added if a device does not implement
the symmetric functions, meaning that the device does not
support symmetric operations.
Hi Shally,
> -Original Message-
> From: Verma, Shally [mailto:shally.ve...@cavium.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 2:40 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo ; Doherty, Declan
> ; akhil.go...@nxp.com; ravi1.ku...@amd.com;
> Jacob, Jerin ; Zhang, Roy Fan
> ; Trahe, Fiona ;
> t...@semihalf.com;
>-Original Message-
>From: Pablo de Lara [mailto:pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com]
>Sent: 28 June 2018 06:23
>To: declan.dohe...@intel.com; akhil.go...@nxp.com; Verma, Shally
>; ravi1.ku...@amd.com; Jacob,
>Jerin ; roy.fan.zh...@intel.com;
>fiona.tr...@intel.com; t...@semihalf.com;
>jian
Since asymmetric functionality will be implemented soon,
not all PMDs must support symmetric sessions.
Therefore, a check is added if a device does not implement
the symmetric functions, meaning that the device does not
support symmetric operations.
Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara
---
lib/librte_cr
4 matches
Mail list logo