On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:13 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 28/10/2020 05:54, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:35 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > The order test stored the flow ID in the deprecated mbuf field udata64.
> > > It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal o
28/10/2020 05:54, Jerin Jacob:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:35 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > The order test stored the flow ID in the deprecated mbuf field udata64.
> > It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> > ---
> > +
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:35 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> The order test stored the flow ID in the deprecated mbuf field udata64.
> It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> ---
> app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c| 4 ++--
>
The order test stored the flow ID in the deprecated mbuf field udata64.
It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
---
app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c| 4 ++--
app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c | 21 -
app/t
4 matches
Mail list logo