Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] hash: separate multi-writer from rw-concurrency

2018-10-15 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
Hi Yipeng, Thank you for the review, appreciate your efforts. Thank you, Honnappa > > > >RW concurrency is required with single writer and multiple reader > >usecase as well. Hence, multi-writer should not be enabled by default > >when RW concurrency is enabled. > > > >Fixes: f2e3001b53ec

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] hash: separate multi-writer from rw-concurrency

2018-10-12 Thread Wang, Yipeng1
>-Original Message- >From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com] >Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 11:32 PM >To: Richardson, Bruce ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wang, Yipeng1 ; >honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; dharmik.thak...@arm.com; >gavin...@arm.com; n

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] hash: separate multi-writer from rw-concurrency

2018-10-11 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
RW concurrency is required with single writer and multiple reader usecase as well. Hence, multi-writer should not be enabled by default when RW concurrency is enabled. Fixes: f2e3001b53ec ("hash: support read/write concurrency") Cc: yipeng1.w...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli Revi