On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:22:51PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 06:39:30PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:13:42AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:51:29PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > As previously discussed i
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 06:39:30PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:13:42AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:51:29PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes
> > > described in [3] (also pasted
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:13:42AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:51:29PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes
> > described in [3] (also pasted below), here is the first non-draft series
> > for this new API.
> >
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:51:29PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes
> described in [3] (also pasted below), here is the first non-draft series
> for this new API.
>
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-August/045181.html
> [2] http:/
My mail reader (thunderbird) is showing this series as a thread of "eal:
postpone vdev initialization" patch series. Is it just me?
If it is a wrong 'in-reply-to', I think it should be corrected or people
might not be able to search for this under right thread.
On Sunday 18 December 2016 07:5
As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes
described in [3] (also pasted below), here is the first non-draft series
for this new API.
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-August/045181.html
[2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-October/048592.html
[3] http://dpdk.org/ml
6 matches
Mail list logo
