Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations

2019-06-05 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 6/5/19 2:52 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: On 5/29/19 3:04 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: Some OVS-DPDK PVP benchmarks show a performance drop when switching from DPDK v17.11 to v18.11. With the addition of packed ring layout su

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations

2019-06-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > On 5/29/19 3:04 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > Some OVS-DPDK PVP benchmarks show a performance drop > > when switching from DPDK v17.11 to v18.11. > > > > With the addition of packed ring layout support, > > rte_vhost_enqueue

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations

2019-06-05 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 5/29/19 3:04 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: Some OVS-DPDK PVP benchmarks show a performance drop when switching from DPDK v17.11 to v18.11. With the addition of packed ring layout support, rte_vhost_enqueue_burst and rte_vhost_dequeue_burst became very large, and only a part of the instruction

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations

2019-05-29 Thread Maxime Coquelin
Some OVS-DPDK PVP benchmarks show a performance drop when switching from DPDK v17.11 to v18.11. With the addition of packed ring layout support, rte_vhost_enqueue_burst and rte_vhost_dequeue_burst became very large, and only a part of the instructions are executed (either packed or split ring used