On 04/06/2016 01:20 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
>> On 04/06/2016 12:32 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder if you should include something in release notes.
>>> We are fixing the API, so I guess we don't need to follow the deprecation
>> process, but at least a note in the docu
On 04/06/2016 12:32 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
>
> I wonder if you should include something in release notes.
> We are fixing the API, so I guess we don't need to follow the deprecation
> process, but at least a note in the documentation?
Good idea, I'll send a v4 with the deprecation no
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 12:15 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash
&
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 12:54 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 4:52 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of dupl
2016-04-05 13:53, Olivier Matz:
> Seen while trying to fix the func_reentrancy autotest. The
> series addresses several issues:
>
> 1/ Hash and lpm return a pointer to an existing object if the user requests
> the
>creation with an already existing name. This look dangerous: when an object
>
Seen while trying to fix the func_reentrancy autotest. The
series addresses several issues:
1/ Hash and lpm return a pointer to an existing object if the user requests the
creation with an already existing name. This look dangerous: when an object
is returned, the user does not know if it sh
7 matches
Mail list logo
