Hi Adrian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Mazarguil
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 4:12 PM
> To: Ori Kam
> Cc: Andrew Rybchenko ; Ferruh Yigit
> ; step...@networkplumber.org; Declan Doherty
> ; dev@dpdk.org; Dekel Peled
> ; Thomas Monjalon ; Nélio
> Laranjeiro ; Yongseok Koh
>
Hey Ori,
(removing most of the discussion, I'll only reply to the summary)
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 08:48:05AM +, Ori Kam wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Thanks for your comments please see my answer below and inline.
>
> Due to a very short time limit and the fact that we have more than
> 4 patches
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your comments please see my answer below and inline.
Due to a very short time limit and the fact that we have more than
4 patches that are based on this we need to close it fast.
As I can see there are number of options:
* the old approach that neither of us like. And which
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:17:01PM +, Ori Kam wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adrien Mazarguil
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 09:00:52AM +, Ori Kam wrote:
> >
> > > > On 10/7/2018 1:57 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > > > In addtion the parameter to to the encap action is a list of
Hi
PSB.
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Mazarguil
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 3:02 PM
> To: Ori Kam
> Cc: Andrew Rybchenko ; Ferruh Yigit
> ; step...@networkplumber.org; Declan Doherty
> ; dev@dpdk.org; Dekel Peled
> ; Thomas Monjalon ; Nélio
> Laranjeiro ; Yongseok Koh
> ; S
Sorry if I'm a bit late to the discussion, please see below.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 09:00:52AM +, Ori Kam wrote:
> > On 10/7/2018 1:57 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > This series implement the generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions
> > and is based on rfc [1] "add generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulati
10/10/2018 11:30, Andrew Rybchenko:
> It is really bad practice that features are accepted without at least
> one implementation/usage.
Yes.
In future, we should take care of not accepting new API without at least
one implementation.
On 10/10/18 12:00 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rybchenko
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:45 AM
To: Ferruh Yigit ; Ori Kam ;
step...@networkplumber.org; Adrien Mazarguil
; Declan Doherty
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dekel Peled ; Thomas Monjalon
; Nélio Laranjeiro ;
Yongse
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Rybchenko
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:45 AM
> To: Ferruh Yigit ; Ori Kam ;
> step...@networkplumber.org; Adrien Mazarguil
> ; Declan Doherty
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dekel Peled ; Thomas Monjalon
> ; Nélio Laranjeiro ;
> Yongseok Koh ; Shahaf Shu
On 10/9/18 7:48 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 10/7/2018 1:57 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
This series implement the generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions
and is based on rfc [1] "add generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions"
Currenlty the encap/decap actions only support encapsulation
of VXLAN and NV
On 10/7/2018 1:57 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> This series implement the generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions
> and is based on rfc [1] "add generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions"
>
> Currenlty the encap/decap actions only support encapsulation
> of VXLAN and NVGRE L2 packets (L2 encapsulation
This series implement the generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions
and is based on rfc [1] "add generic L2/L3 tunnel encapsulation actions"
Currenlty the encap/decap actions only support encapsulation
of VXLAN and NVGRE L2 packets (L2 encapsulation is where
the inner packet has a valid Ethernet
12 matches
Mail list logo
