Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes

2020-04-10 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 3/12/20 12:19 AM, Itsuro Oda wrote: > Currently, iotlb cache name is comprised of vid and virtqueue > index. For example, "iotlb_cache_0_0". Because vid is assigned > per process, iotlb cache name is not unique among multi processes. > For example a secondary process uses a vhost > (ex. eth_v

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes

2020-04-09 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 3/12/20 12:19 AM, Itsuro Oda wrote: > Currently, iotlb cache name is comprised of vid and virtqueue > index. For example, "iotlb_cache_0_0". Because vid is assigned > per process, iotlb cache name is not unique among multi processes. > For example a secondary process uses a vhost > (ex. eth_v

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes

2020-03-11 Thread Itsuro Oda
Currently, iotlb cache name is comprised of vid and virtqueue index. For example, "iotlb_cache_0_0". Because vid is assigned per process, iotlb cache name is not unique among multi processes. For example a secondary process uses a vhost (ex. eth_vhost0,iface=/tmp/sock0) and another secondary proces