Hi， Hemant:
This patch will be dropped from the patchset next version.
Thanks
Zhiyong
>> In testpmd, the following function will be called to validate the port_id.
> >> So, It is necessary to modify the max port num RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS.
> >
> > There are quite a lot memory allocations (both
, Keith
; step...@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common_base: extend RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS
from 32 to 1024
Hi, Bruce:
-Original Message-
From: Richardson, Bruce
Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 5:09 PM
To: Yang, Zhiyong
Cc: Yao, Lei A ; dev@dpdk.org; tho
Hi, konstantin:
> > > It should be possible to have a dynamically allocated ethdev array,
> > > which would allow use to have a default value - which could be e.g.
> > > 32 or 64 as now - while also allowing a run-time parameter to increase
> > > that
> to thousands if needed.
> > >
> > > /Bruce
et;
> > Yigit, Ferruh ; Wiles, Keith
> > ;
> > step...@networkplumber.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common_base: extend
> > RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS from 32 to 1024
> > > > > --- a/config/common_base
> > > > > +++ b/config/common_base
..@networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common_base: extend RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS
> from 32 to 1024
>
> Hi, Bruce:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richardson, Bruce
> > Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 5:09 PM
> > To: Yang, Zhi
Hi, Bruce:
> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 5:09 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong
> Cc: Yao, Lei A ; dev@dpdk.org; tho...@monjalon.net;
> Yigit, Ferruh ; Wiles, Keith ;
> step...@networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [P
hiyong
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common_base: extend RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS
> from 32 to 1024
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhiyong Yang
> > Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 1:58 PM
> >
erruh ; Wiles,
> > Keith
> > ; step...@networkplumber.org; Yang, Zhiyong
> >
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common_base: extend
> > RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS from 32 to 1024
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: dev
; Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh ;
> > Wiles, Keith ; step...@networkplumber.org;
> > Yang, Zhiyong
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common_base: extend
> > RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS from 32 to 1024
> >
> > The reasons to modify RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS is the following.
> >
: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common_base: extend
> RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS from 32 to 1024
>
> The reasons to modify RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS is the following.
>
> 1. RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS=32 by default has not met user's requirements
> with development of virtualization technology. Some vde
The reasons to modify RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS is the following.
1. RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS=32 by default has not met user's requirements
with development of virtualization technology. Some vdev users have
to modify the setting before the compiling.
2. port_id have been extended to 16 bits definition. But for m
11 matches
Mail list logo
