Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] eal: add accessor functions for lcore_config

2019-05-03 Thread David Marchand
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 7:16 PM Stephen Hemminger < step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > The fields of the internal EAL core configuration are currently > laid bare as part of the API. This is not good practice and limits > fixing issues with layout and sizes. > > Make new accessor functions for t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] eal: add accessor functions for lcore_config

2019-04-30 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:03:47 + Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:46 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Stephen Hemminger > > Subject: [dpdk-d

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] eal: add accessor functions for lcore_config

2019-04-16 Thread Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:46 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Stephen Hemminger > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] eal: add accessor functions for > lcore_config > > The fiel

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] eal: add accessor functions for lcore_config

2019-04-10 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The fields of the internal EAL core configuration are currently laid bare as part of the API. This is not good practice and limits fixing issues with layout and sizes. Make new accessor functions for the fields used by current drivers and examples. Mark return code functions as experimental since