> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 6:55 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang;
> olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: assign valid bit values for some RX and
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 1:08 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang; olivier.matz at
> 6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: assign valid bit values for some RX
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 8:40 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang;
> olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: assign valid bit values for some RX an
OK. I will send out another patch according to your comments. Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Helin
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 6:50 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang;
> olivier.mat
Hi Helin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 1:46 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang; Ananyev, Konstantin;
> olivier.matz at 6wind.com; Zhang, Helin
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: assign valid bit va
Before redefining mbuf structure, there was lack of free bits in
'ol_flags' (32 bits in total) for new RX or TX flags. So it tried
to reuse existant bits as most as possible, or even assigning 0 to
some of bit flags. After new mbuf structure defined, there are
quite a lot of free bits. So those new
6 matches
Mail list logo
