On 03.10.2018 17:39, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2018 11:07 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 03.10.2018 11:32, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 03.10.2018 11:02, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 10/03/2018 09:57 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 03.10.2018 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 10/03/2018 11:07 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 03.10.2018 11:32, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 03.10.2018 11:02, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 10/03/2018 09:57 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 03.10.2018 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 10/02/2018 04:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 02.10.2018 12:36,
On 03.10.2018 11:32, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 03.10.2018 11:02, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2018 09:57 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 03.10.2018 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 10/02/2018 04:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 03.10.2018 11:02, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2018 09:57 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 03.10.2018 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/02/2018 04:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Return of message handling has now changed
On 10/03/2018 09:57 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 03.10.2018 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 10/02/2018 04:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can
take non-negative value that is not zero in case
On 03.10.2018 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/02/2018 04:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>> Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can
>>> take non-negative value that is not zero in case a reply is
>>> needed. But the code
On 10/02/2018 04:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can
take non-negative value that is not zero in case a reply is
needed. But the code checking the variable afterwards has not
been updated, leadi
On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can
> take non-negative value that is not zero in case a reply is
> needed. But the code checking the variable afterwards has not
> been updated, leading to success messages handling being
> tre
Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can
take non-negative value that is not zero in case a reply is
needed. But the code checking the variable afterwards has not
been updated, leading to success messages handling being
treated as errors.
Fixes: 4e601952cae6 ("vhost: message
9 matches
Mail list logo