Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/14] eal: expose rte_eal_using_phys_addrs

2017-09-18 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:17:08PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Hello Gaetan, > > On Monday 18 September 2017 03:01 PM, Gaetan Rivet wrote: > >This function was previously private to the EAL layer. > >Other subsystems requires it, such as the PCI bus. > > > >In order not to force other component

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/14] eal: expose rte_eal_using_phys_addrs

2017-09-18 Thread Shreyansh Jain
Hello Gaetan, On Monday 18 September 2017 03:01 PM, Gaetan Rivet wrote: This function was previously private to the EAL layer. Other subsystems requires it, such as the PCI bus. In order not to force other components to include stdbool, which is incompatible with several NIC drivers, the return

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/14] eal: expose rte_eal_using_phys_addrs

2017-09-18 Thread Gaetan Rivet
This function was previously private to the EAL layer. Other subsystems requires it, such as the PCI bus. In order not to force other components to include stdbool, which is incompatible with several NIC drivers, the return type has been changed from bool to int. Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet ---