Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/26] DPDK PMD for OCTEONTX NW device

2017-10-11 Thread Jerin Jacob
-Original Message- > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:35:27 +0200 > From: Thomas Monjalon > To: Santosh Shukla > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit , > jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/26] DPDK PMD for OCTEONTX NW device > > 09/10/

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/26] DPDK PMD for OCTEONTX NW device

2017-10-11 Thread Thomas Monjalon
09/10/2017 04:07, Ferruh Yigit: > On 10/8/2017 1:44 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: > > v2: > > Includes Minor changes like: > > - Incorporated minor review comment (Suggested y John) > > - Added correct pool handle ops name i.e. from mbuf-pool-ops to > > mbuf-pool-ops-name in the doc. > > - Rebased on

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/26] DPDK PMD for OCTEONTX NW device

2017-10-08 Thread santosh
On Monday 09 October 2017 07:37 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/8/2017 1:44 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: >> v2: >> Includes Minor changes like: >> - Incorporated minor review comment (Suggested y John) >> - Added correct pool handle ops name i.e. from mbuf-pool-ops to >> mbuf-pool-ops-name in the d

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/26] DPDK PMD for OCTEONTX NW device

2017-10-08 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/8/2017 1:44 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: > v2: > Includes Minor changes like: > - Incorporated minor review comment (Suggested y John) > - Added correct pool handle ops name i.e. from mbuf-pool-ops to > mbuf-pool-ops-name in the doc. > - Rebased on Octeontx-fpavf v3 series and tested for same.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/26] DPDK PMD for OCTEONTX NW device

2017-10-08 Thread Santosh Shukla
v2: Includes Minor changes like: - Incorporated minor review comment (Suggested y John) - Added correct pool handle ops name i.e. from mbuf-pool-ops to mbuf-pool-ops-name in the doc. - Rebased on Octeontx-fpavf v3 series and tested for same. - Refer[7]: rebased (octeontx PMD + octeontx_fpavf memp