On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:41:01PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-03-28 16:24, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:12:26PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2017-03-28 09:58, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > > > > As follow-up to my own mail, for this specific library example, I
> >
2017-03-28 16:24, Bruce Richardson:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:12:26PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2017-03-28 09:58, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > > > As follow-up to my own mail, for this specific library example, I
> > > > > wouldn't look to remove it from DPDK anyway. Parsing ini files is
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:12:26PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-03-28 09:58, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > > As follow-up to my own mail, for this specific library example, I
> > > > wouldn't look to remove it from DPDK anyway. Parsing ini files is fairly
> > > > trivial, so I think it's not
> > This library is an important utility for applications, similar to
> > librte_cmdline
> and others. I think it is not fair from your side to refer to librte_cfgfile
> without
> any reference to librte_cmdline.
>
> I agree Cristian.
> I was just writing another email about removing librte_cmd
2017-03-28 09:58, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > As follow-up to my own mail, for this specific library example, I
> > > wouldn't look to remove it from DPDK anyway. Parsing ini files is fairly
> > > trivial, so I think it's not a big deal to keep our own version and not
> > > have an external depende
> > As follow-up to my own mail, for this specific library example, I
> > wouldn't look to remove it from DPDK anyway. Parsing ini files is fairly
> > trivial, so I think it's not a big deal to keep our own version and not
> > have an external dependency - especially since it's already there and no
2017-03-28 10:22, Bruce Richardson:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:29:44AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2017-03-09 08:10, Allain Legacy:
> > > > This patchset includes some minor enhancements that we have developped
> > > >
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:29:44AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2017-03-09 08:10, Allain Legacy:
> > > This patchset includes some minor enhancements that we have developped for
> > > our DPDK application. We would like to co
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:29:44AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-03-09 08:10, Allain Legacy:
> > This patchset includes some minor enhancements that we have developped for
> > our DPDK application. We would like to contribute them upstream to help
> > ease adoption of the DPDK by anyone loo
2017-03-09 08:10, Allain Legacy:
> This patchset includes some minor enhancements that we have developped for
> our DPDK application. We would like to contribute them upstream to help
> ease adoption of the DPDK by anyone looking for this type of
> functionality. The commit logs on each patch sho
This patchset includes some minor enhancements that we have developped for
our DPDK application. We would like to contribute them upstream to help
ease adoption of the DPDK by anyone looking for this type of
functionality. The commit logs on each patch should be self-sufficient in
explaining the
11 matches
Mail list logo
