; shreyansh.j...@nxp.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Akhil Goyal
> ;
> O'loingsigh, Mairtin
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] introduce multi-function processing
> support
>
> Hi Fiona, see below
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Trahe, Fion
Hi Fiona, see below
> -Original Message-
> From: Trahe, Fiona
> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:37 AM
>
> Hi David,
>
> Answer inline below
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Coyle, David
> > Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:26 AM
> >
> > Thanks for the detailed review Fiona.
t.agra...@nxp.com; Akhil Goyal
> ;
> O'loingsigh, Mairtin
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] introduce multi-function processing
> support
>
> Thanks for the detailed review Fiona.
>
> Based on your feedback, we will reduce the scope of our plans for
> m
Thanks for the detailed review Fiona.
Based on your feedback, we will reduce the scope of our plans for
multi-function processing support in DPDK.
We will focus on implementing a rawdev-based AESNI-MB PMD for Crypto-CRC and
Crypto-CRC-BIP processing and we will add QAT Crypto-CRC support in a l
On 4/7/2020 12:27 PM, Coyle, David wrote:
> Hi Ferruh, see below
>
>>>
>>> While DPDK's rte_cryptodev and rte_compressdev allow many
>>> cryptographic and compression algorithms to be chained together in one
>>> operation, there is no way to chain these with any error detection or
>>> checksum alg
gra...@nxp.com; Akhil Goyal
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] introduce multi-function processing
> support
>
> Hi Ferruh, see below
>
> > >
> > > While DPDK's rte_cryptodev and rte_compressdev allow many
> > > cryptographic and compression
Hi Ferruh, see below
> >
> > While DPDK's rte_cryptodev and rte_compressdev allow many
> > cryptographic and compression algorithms to be chained together in one
> > operation, there is no way to chain these with any error detection or
> > checksum algorithms. And there is no way to chain crypto a
On 4/3/2020 5:36 PM, David Coyle wrote:
> PLEASE NOTE: This patchset supercedes the following v1 patches which were
> mistakenly added as stand-alone patches (apologies for any confusion this
> may cause)
>
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66733/
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66735/
> https
PLEASE NOTE: This patchset supercedes the following v1 patches which were
mistakenly added as stand-alone patches (apologies for any confusion this
may cause)
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66733/
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66735/
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/66736/
PLEASE NOTE ALSO:
9 matches
Mail list logo
