Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix potential buffer overrun

2019-04-30 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 4/29/2019 3:02 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 29-Apr-19 2:53 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 4/25/2019 6:17 PM, Herakliusz Lipiec wrote: >>> When secondary to primary process synchronization occours >>> there is no check for number of fds which could cause buffer overrun. >>> >>> Bugzilla ID: 25

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix potential buffer overrun

2019-04-29 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 29-Apr-19 2:58 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: On Apr 25, 2019, at 10:17 AM, Lipiec, Herakliusz wrote: When secondary to primary process synchronization occours there is no check for number of fds which could cause buffer overrun. Bugzilla ID: 252 Fixes: c9aa56edec8e ("net/tap: access primary p

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix potential buffer overrun

2019-04-29 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 29-Apr-19 2:53 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 4/25/2019 6:17 PM, Herakliusz Lipiec wrote: When secondary to primary process synchronization occours there is no check for number of fds which could cause buffer overrun. Bugzilla ID: 252 Fixes: c9aa56edec8e ("net/tap: access primary process queues

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix potential buffer overrun

2019-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
> On Apr 25, 2019, at 10:17 AM, Lipiec, Herakliusz > wrote: > > When secondary to primary process synchronization occours > there is no check for number of fds which could cause buffer overrun. > > Bugzilla ID: 252 > Fixes: c9aa56edec8e ("net/tap: access primary process queues from secondary

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix potential buffer overrun

2019-04-29 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 4/25/2019 6:17 PM, Herakliusz Lipiec wrote: > When secondary to primary process synchronization occours > there is no check for number of fds which could cause buffer overrun. > > Bugzilla ID: 252 > Fixes: c9aa56edec8e ("net/tap: access primary process queues from secondary") > Cc: rasl...@mell

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix potential buffer overrun

2019-04-29 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 25-Apr-19 6:17 PM, Herakliusz Lipiec wrote: When secondary to primary process synchronization occours there is no check for number of fds which could cause buffer overrun. Bugzilla ID: 252 Fixes: c9aa56edec8e ("net/tap: access primary process queues from secondary") Cc: rasl...@mellanox.com C

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix potential buffer overrun

2019-04-25 Thread Herakliusz Lipiec
When secondary to primary process synchronization occours there is no check for number of fds which could cause buffer overrun. Bugzilla ID: 252 Fixes: c9aa56edec8e ("net/tap: access primary process queues from secondary") Cc: rasl...@mellanox.com Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Herakliusz Lip