Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/sfc: do not panic if alarms are not supported

2017-01-23 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/19/2017 11:12 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > Alarms are not supported on the FreeBSD. > Application must poll link status periodically itself using > rte_eth_link_get_nowait() to avoid management event queue overflow. > > Fixes: 2de39f4e1310 ("net/sfc: periodic management EVQ polling using ala

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/sfc: do not panic if alarms are not supported

2017-01-20 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 01/20/2017 03:36 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 1/19/2017 11:12 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: Alarms are not supported on the FreeBSD. Application must poll link status periodically itself using rte_eth_link_get_nowait() to avoid management event queue overflow. Fixes: 2de39f4e1310 ("net/sfc: peri

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/sfc: do not panic if alarms are not supported

2017-01-20 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/19/2017 11:12 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > Alarms are not supported on the FreeBSD. > Application must poll link status periodically itself using > rte_eth_link_get_nowait() to avoid management event queue overflow. > > Fixes: 2de39f4e1310 ("net/sfc: periodic management EVQ polling using ala

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/sfc: do not panic if alarms are not supported

2017-01-19 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
Alarms are not supported on the FreeBSD. Application must poll link status periodically itself using rte_eth_link_get_nowait() to avoid management event queue overflow. Fixes: 2de39f4e1310 ("net/sfc: periodic management EVQ polling using alarm") Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko Reviewed-by: Andre