Hi Ferruh,
I realized there were some ambiguities. I will modify commit in the new patch.
Regards,
Wenjun
-Original Message-
From: Yigit, Ferruh
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 5:30 PM
To: Wu, Wenjun1 ; dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: extend
On 4/25/2021 3:02 AM, Wenjun Wu wrote:
> When resetting VF, VF will issue reset command to PF, wait a
> fixed amount of time, and assume VF reset is done. However,
> due to the change of dpdk related library content, the original
> delay is not enough. When we use DPDK PF instead of kernel PF,
> it
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Wenjun Wu
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 10:03 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
> Cc: Wu, Wenjun1
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: extend VF reset waiting time
Tested-by: Zhou, Jun
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Wenjun Wu
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 10:03 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
> Cc: Wu, Wenjun1
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: extend VF reset waiting time
>
> When resetting VF, VF will issue res
When resetting VF, VF will issue reset command to PF, wait a
fixed amount of time, and assume VF reset is done. However,
due to the change of dpdk related library content, the original
delay is not enough. When we use DPDK PF instead of kernel PF,
it may cause VF start error.
This patch extend VF
5 matches
Mail list logo
