Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix max Rx packet size

2021-04-12 Thread Zhang, Qi Z
> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Wang, Haiyue > Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 8:59 AM > To: Zhang, AlvinX ; Guo, Jia > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix max Rx packet size > > > -Original M

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix max Rx packet size

2021-04-08 Thread Wang, Haiyue
> -Original Message- > From: Zhang, AlvinX > Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 15:41 > To: Wang, Haiyue ; Guo, Jia > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, AlvinX ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix max Rx packet size > > According to E1000_ETH_OVERHEAD definition, max_rx_pkt_len contai

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix max Rx packet size

2021-04-08 Thread Chen, LingliX
> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Alvin Zhang > Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 3:41 PM > To: Wang, Haiyue ; Guo, Jia > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, AlvinX ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix max Rx packet size > Tested-by: Chen Lingli

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/e1000: fix max Rx packet size

2021-04-08 Thread Alvin Zhang
According to E1000_ETH_OVERHEAD definition, max_rx_pkt_len contains one VLAN tag size. Therefore when config RLPML register, if dual VLAN not enabled there is no need to add VLAN tag size to max_rx_pkt_len, otherwise only one another VLAN tag size should be added to. Fixes: e51abef39382 ("igb: fix