On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:32 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> @@ -1050,7 +1055,10 @@ rte_eal_memory_detach(void)
> * config - we can't zero it out because it might still be referenced
> * by other processes.
> */
> - rte_mem_unmap(mcfg, RTE_ALIGN(sizeof(*mcfg), page_sz))
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:32 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
>
> rte_eal_memory_detach() did not account for cases where multi-process
> mode is disabled: --in-memory and --no-shconf. This resulted
> in unmapping memory that had not been mapped, which caused errors:
>
> EAL: Could not unmap memory: N
On 24-Mar-21 7:32 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
rte_eal_memory_detach() did not account for cases where multi-process
mode is disabled: --in-memory and --no-shconf. This resulted
in unmapping memory that had not been mapped, which caused errors:
EAL: Could not unmap memory: No error (Windows)
On 3/24/2021 12:32 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
rte_eal_memory_detach() did not account for cases where multi-process
mode is disabled: --in-memory and --no-shconf. This resulted
in unmapping memory that had not been mapped, which caused errors:
EAL: Could not unmap memory: No error (Windows
rte_eal_memory_detach() did not account for cases where multi-process
mode is disabled: --in-memory and --no-shconf. This resulted
in unmapping memory that had not been mapped, which caused errors:
EAL: Could not unmap memory: No error (Windows)
EAL: Cannot munmap(0x1d47f40, 0x7000): Inv
5 matches
Mail list logo
