On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:22:32 +0800
Yangchao Zhou wrote:
> va2pa depends on the physical address and virtual address offset of
> current mbuf. It may get the wrong physical address of next mbuf which
> allocated in another hugepage segment.
>
> In rte_mempool_populate_default(), trying to allocat
:49 PM
To: Yangchao Zhou ; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] kni: fix possible kernel crash with va2pa
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
On 3/12/2019 9:22 AM, Yangchao Zhou wrote:
> va2pa depends
On 3/12/2019 9:22 AM, Yangchao Zhou wrote:
> va2pa depends on the physical address and virtual address offset of
> current mbuf. It may get the wrong physical address of next mbuf which
> allocated in another hugepage segment.
>
> In rte_mempool_populate_default(), trying to allocate whole block o
On 3/12/2019 9:22 AM, Yangchao Zhou wrote:
> va2pa depends on the physical address and virtual address offset of
> current mbuf. It may get the wrong physical address of next mbuf which
> allocated in another hugepage segment.
>
> In rte_mempool_populate_default(), trying to allocate whole block o
va2pa depends on the physical address and virtual address offset of
current mbuf. It may get the wrong physical address of next mbuf which
allocated in another hugepage segment.
In rte_mempool_populate_default(), trying to allocate whole block of
contiguous memory could be failed. Then, it would r
5 matches
Mail list logo
