On 07/22/2016 01:48 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>> This is an ABI deprecation notice for DPDK 16.11 in librte_ether about
>> changes in rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_desc_lim structures.
>>
>> As discussed in that thread:
>>
>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023603.html
>>
>> Diffe
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:52:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-07-28 19:29, Jerin Jacob:
> > Above things worries me, I wouldn't have cared if the changes are not comes
> > in fastpath and I don't think this sort of issues will never get fixed any
> > time
> > soon in this community.
> >
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:01:16PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
> > > >
> > > > Not according to proposal. It can't be too as application has no
> > > > idea what PMD driver does with "prep" what is the implication on a
> > > > HW if application does not
> > >
> > > Why application write
2016-07-28 21:55, Jerin Jacob:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:52:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-07-28 19:29, Jerin Jacob:
> > > Above things worries me, I wouldn't have cared if the changes are not
> > > comes
> > > in fastpath and I don't think this sort of issues will never get fixed
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:36:07AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > If it does not cope up then it can skip tx'ing in the actual tx burst
> > itself and move the "skipped" tx packets to end of the list in the tx
> > burst so that application can take the action on "skipped" packet after
> > th
2016-07-28 19:29, Jerin Jacob:
> Above things worries me, I wouldn't have cared if the changes are not comes
> in fastpath and I don't think this sort of issues will never get fixed any
> time
> soon in this community.
>
> So I given up.
I feel something goes wrong here but I cannot understand y
Hi,
Jumping into this thread, it looks it's the last pending patch remaining
for the release.
For reference, the idea of tx_prep() was mentionned some time ago in
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002504.html
Few comments below.
On 07/28/2016 03:01 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Right
On 07/28/2016 02:38 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:36:07AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>> If it does not cope up then it can skip tx'ing in the actual tx burst
>>> itself and move the "skipped" tx packets to end of the list in the tx
>>> burst so that application can t
On 07/21/2016 06:24 PM, Tomasz Kulasek wrote:
> This is an ABI deprecation notice for DPDK 16.11 in librte_ether about
> changes in rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_desc_lim structures.
>
> As discussed in that thread:
>
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023603.html
>
> Different NIC models d
Hi Olivier,
>
> Hi,
>
> Jumping into this thread, it looks it's the last pending patch remaining for
> the release.
>
> For reference, the idea of tx_prep() was mentionned some time ago in
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002504.html
>
> Few comments below.
>
> On 07/28/2016 03:01
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 12:39 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change for rte_et
c: Kulasek, TomaszX ; dev at dpdk.org;
> > > > > Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change for
> > > > > rte_eth_dev structure
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 01
b at caviumnetworks.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:11 PM
> > > > To: Thomas Monjalon
> > > > Cc: Kulasek, TomaszX ; dev at dpdk.org;
> > > > Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce A
aszX ; dev at dpdk.org;
> > Ananyev, Konstantin
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change for rte_eth_dev
> > structure
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 01:59:01AM -0700, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulase
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 01:59:01AM -0700, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek
> > > ---
> > > +* In 16.11 ABI changes are plained: the ``rte_eth_dev`` structure will be
> > > + extended with new function pointer ``tx_pkt_prep`` allowing
> > > verification
> > > + and proc
: Thomas Monjalon
> > > Cc: Kulasek, TomaszX ; dev at dpdk.org;
> > > Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change for
> > > rte_eth_dev structure
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 01:59:01AM -0700, Thomas Mo
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 6:11 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: Kulasek, TomaszX ; dev at dpdk.org;
> Ananyev, Konstantin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: an
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek
> > ---
> > +* In 16.11 ABI changes are plained: the ``rte_eth_dev`` structure will be
> > + extended with new function pointer ``tx_pkt_prep`` allowing verification
> > + and processing of packet burst to meet HW specific requirements before
> > + transmit. Al
>
> This is an ABI deprecation notice for DPDK 16.11 in librte_ether about
> changes in rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_desc_lim structures.
>
> As discussed in that thread:
>
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023603.html
>
> Different NIC models depending on HW offload requested might
This is an ABI deprecation notice for DPDK 16.11 in librte_ether about
changes in rte_eth_dev and rte_eth_desc_lim structures.
As discussed in that thread:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023603.html
Different NIC models depending on HW offload requested might impose
different req
20 matches
Mail list logo
