> > For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
> > Some discussions already took place here:
> > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev
Acked-by: John Daley
Acked-
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:16:14AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
> Some discussions already took place here:
> http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob
>
> For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
> Some discussions already took place here:
> http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
> ---
Acked-by: John Daley
Also, definitely +1 on trying to get m->next into the first cache l
> For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
> Some discussions already took place here:
> http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon
k-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change for mbuf structure
>
> For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
> Some discussions already took place here:
> http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
> ---
>
>
On 7/20/2016 8:16 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
> Some discussions already took place here:
> http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
> ---
>
> v1->v2:
> - reword the sentences to keep things
For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
Some discussions already took place here:
http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
---
v1->v2:
- reword the sentences to keep things more open, as suggested by Bruce
doc/guides/rel_notes/dep
7 matches
Mail list logo