Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: catch coredumps

2021-03-03 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:06 PM David Marchand wrote: > > Parts of the unit tests code rely on forked/secondary processes > (expectedly) failing. > A crash in those situations could be missed so add a check on coredumps > presence after unit tests have run. > When unit tests fail, it can also help

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: catch coredumps

2021-03-02 Thread Aaron Conole
David Marchand writes: > Parts of the unit tests code rely on forked/secondary processes > (expectedly) failing. > A crash in those situations could be missed so add a check on coredumps > presence after unit tests have run. > When unit tests fail, it can also help checking for coredumps as it >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: catch coredumps

2021-03-02 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 16:05 +0100, David Marchand wrote: > Parts of the unit tests code rely on forked/secondary processes > (expectedly) failing. > A crash in those situations could be missed so add a check on coredumps > presence after unit tests have run. > When unit tests fail, it can also help

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: catch coredumps

2021-01-25 Thread David Marchand
Parts of the unit tests code rely on forked/secondary processes (expectedly) failing. A crash in those situations could be missed so add a check on coredumps presence after unit tests have run. When unit tests fail, it can also help checking for coredumps as it could give more insights on what happ