Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 00/12] Arm build options rework

2021-01-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
19/01/2021 16:10, Juraj Linkeš: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > I consider these patches (9, 11, 12) need more review or rework: > > > > > build: disable drivers in Arm builds > > > build: add Arm SoC meson option > > > config: fix Arm implementer and its SoCs > > > > I've decided to partially

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 00/12] Arm build options rework

2021-01-19 Thread Juraj Linkeš
jerinjac...@gmail.com; > hemant.agra...@nxp.com; ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com; > ferruh.yi...@intel.com; abo...@pensando.io; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 00/12] Arm build options rework > > 15/01/2021 14:25, Juraj Linkeš: > > build: rename Arm build variables

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 00/12] Arm build options rework

2021-01-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
15/01/2021 14:25, Juraj Linkeš: > build: rename Arm build variables > build: remove unused or superfluous variables > build: reformat and move Arm config and comments > build: simplify how Arm flags are processed > build: organize Arm config into dict > build: isolate configuration for

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 00/12] Arm build options rework

2021-01-15 Thread Juraj Linkeš
The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, Graviton2 or Ampere Altra. Add a way to specify the cpu count and numa node count for cross builds