monjalon.net; Ruifeng Wang
> > ; Phil Yang ;
> > vcchu...@amazon.com; Dharmik Thakkar ;
> > jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> > (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> > ferruh.yi...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; nd
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v
c...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:41:45AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > > 3) W
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:41:45AM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > 3) We need to build kni against the aarch64 kernel headers, but it
> > > fails. It appears that kernel/linux/kni/meson.build doesn’t pass any
> > > cross-compile flags in the make command it creates. The diff below
> > > shows how
> > 3) We need to build kni against the aarch64 kernel headers, but it
> > fails. It appears that kernel/linux/kni/meson.build doesn’t pass any
> > cross-compile flags in the make command it creates. The diff below
> > shows how I hardcoded it to get it to work for now. Thoughts on how to
> > do th
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >v14:
> > >> > > >Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Series
> > >> > > >Tested-
> > >by:
> > >> > > >Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by: Dharmik
> > >Thakkar
> > >> > > > Series Teste
...@amazon.com; Dharmik Thakkar ;
> >jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> >(ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> >ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> >; nd
> >Subject: [EXT] R
ar
>; jerinjac...@gmail.com;
>hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
>(ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
>ferruh.yi...@intel.com
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; Honnappa Nagarahalli
>; nd
>Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00
> >
> > > >
> > > >v14:
> > > >Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).
> > > >
> > > >Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by:
> > > >Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by: Dharmik Thakkar
> > > > Series Tested-by: Vimal Chungath
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Series Tested-by: Pa
.@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde
> (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com) ;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; nd
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
>
>
>
> > >
> > >v14:
> > >Resent for retesting
; jerinjac...@gmail.com;
> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com)
> ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; nd
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
>
>
> > On Jan 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
&g
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:16:38AM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>On Jan 11, 2021, at 5:01 AM, Bruce Richardson
><[1]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
>
> On Mon, J
> On Jan 11, 2021, at 5:01 AM, Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the
> > > > build
> > > fails with this er
08/01/2021 21:20, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> > >
> > > 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the build
> > fails with this error. It’s been broken for a long time; maybe this option
> > isn’t
> > supported an
>
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> >
> > 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the build
> fails with this error. It’s been broken for a long time; maybe this option
> isn’t
> supported and should be blocked earlier?
> >
> > ../../
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> 1) Bruce - when the “-Ddefault_library=both” flag is passed in, the build
> fails with this error. It’s been broken for a long time; maybe this option
> isn’t supported and should be blocked earlier?
>
> ../../dpdk/app/mes
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:46:20PM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Jan 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> 30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
> >>>
> On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
> >> wrote:
>
> The current way of specifying Arm config
> >
> >v14:
> >Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).
> >
> >Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by:
> >Jerin Jacob Series Tested-by: Dharmik Thakkar
> > Series Tested-by: Vimal Chungath
> >
> >
>
> Series Tested-by: Pavan Nikhilesh
>
> Also, I believe we need to
jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com;
>ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com; ferruh.yi...@intel.com
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Juraj Linkeš
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
>
>The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient
>since we can't
> On Jan 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
>>
>> 30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
>>>
On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
>> wrote:
The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is
insufficient since we can't identify the SoC we're buildi
>
> 30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
> >
> > > On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is
> > > insufficient since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from
> > > the MIDR information. For example, we can't di
30/12/2020 20:09, Andrew Boyer:
>
> > On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš
> > wrote:
> >
> > The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient
> > since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR
> > information. For example, we can't distinguish betw
> On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
>
> The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient
> since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR
> information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, Graviton2
> or Ampere Altra.
>
> Add
The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient
since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR
information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, Graviton2
or Ampere Altra.
Add a way to specify the cpu count and numa node count for cross builds
24 matches
Mail list logo
