On 28 March 2016 at 15:42, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> 2016-03-27 21:39, Marc:
> > On 27 March 2016 at 11:53, Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > > 2016-03-26 11:24, Marc:
> > > > On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Thomas Monjalon <
> thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 2016-03-2
Hi Marc,
2016-03-27 21:39, Marc:
> On 27 March 2016 at 11:53, Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> > 2016-03-26 11:24, Marc:
> > > On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Thomas Monjalon
> > > wrote:
> > > > 2016-03-25 22:30, Marc:
> > > > > From v9 to v10 patchset the values ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG and
> > > > ETH_LIN
On 27 March 2016 at 11:53, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> 2016-03-26 11:24, Marc:
> > On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> > > 2016-03-25 22:30, Marc:
> > > > From v9 to v10 patchset the values ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG and
> > > ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED were flipped. Reverting this makes
2016-03-26 11:24, Marc:
> On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> > 2016-03-25 22:30, Marc:
> > > From v9 to v10 patchset the values ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG and
> > ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED were flipped. Reverting this makes it work:
> > >
> > > marc at Beluga:~/personal/dpdk/tools$ git d
On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for finding time to help.
>
> 2016-03-25 22:30, Marc:
> > From v9 to v10 patchset the values ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG and
> ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED were flipped. Reverting this makes it work:
> >
> > marc at Beluga:~/personal/dpdk
Hi Marc,
Thanks for finding time to help.
2016-03-25 22:30, Marc:
> From v9 to v10 patchset the values ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG and
> ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED were flipped. Reverting this makes it work:
>
> marc at Beluga:~/personal/dpdk/tools$ git diff
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/
ONEG (1 << 0) /**< Autonegotiate (all speeds)
*/
+#define ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG (0 << 0) /**< Autonegotiate (all speeds)
*/
+#define ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED (1 << 0) /**< Disable autoneg (fixed
speed) */
#define ETH_LINK_SPEED_10M_HD (1 << 1) /**< 10 Mbp
t;> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>> > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:36 PM
>> > To: Xu, Qian Q
>> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Marc ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>> > ; Lu, Wenzhuo ;
>> &g
]
> > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:36 PM
> > To: Xu, Qian Q
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Marc ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > ; Lu, Wenzhuo ;
> > Zhang, Helin ; Richardson, Bruce
> > ; Glynn, Michael J <
> michael.j.glynn at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-
2016-03-25 15:07, Zhang, Helin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > Is there someone investigating the issue?
>
> Beilei is investigating that, she will give her findings soon later, and
> possibly a fix after validating that.
> Thanks!
Great thanks!
After talking with Bruce, we have decided to close RC
: Xu, Qian Q
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Marc ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Lu, Wenzhuo ;
> Zhang, Helin ; Richardson, Bruce
> ; Glynn, Michael J intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
> refactoring
>
> Is there someone investigating t
To: Xu, Qian Q
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin;
> Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
> refactoring
>
> Qian,
>
> On 23 Marc
, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin;
Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
refactoring
On 24 March 2016 at 07:21, Xu, Qian Q mailto:qian.q.xu
at intel.com>> wrote:
Marc
I didn?t quite get your points, I observed that after applyin
D?a 17.03.2016 o 19:08 Thomas Monjalon nap?sal(a):
> There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for
> autonegotiation with Intel devices (patch #6).
> I would not be surprised to see some bugs in this rework.
>
> The capabilities must be adapted per device. It can be
> improved in a sepa
to:marc.sune at gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *
> Marc
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:54 AM
> *To:* Xu, Qian Q
> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin;
> Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G
ail.com>; Richardson, Bruce;
dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
refactoring
2016-03-17 19:08, Thomas Monjalon:
> There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for
> autonegotiation with Intel d
age-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:59 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin
> Cc: marcdevel at gmail.com; Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8
2016-03-23 01:18, Xu, Qian Q:
> We have tested with intel nic and found port can't be started for all
> nics:ixgbe/i40e/igb/bonding, see attached mail for more details.
> Please check and fix it.
Thanks for testing.
This patchset was in the air for several months but unfortunately there was
no t
March 23, 2016 3:59 AM
To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin
Cc: marcdevel at gmail.com; Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
refactoring
2016-03-17 19:08, Thomas Monjalon:
> There are still too few tests and
2016-03-17 19:08, Thomas Monjalon:
> There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for
> autonegotiation with Intel devices (patch #6).
> I would not be surprised to see some bugs in this rework.
Any feedback about autoneg in e1000/ixgbe/i40e?
Has it been tested before its integration in R
There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for
autonegotiation with Intel devices (patch #6).
I would not be surprised to see some bugs in this rework.
The capabilities must be adapted per device. It can be
improved in a separate patch.
It will be integrated in 16.04-rc2.
Please test a
21 matches
Mail list logo
