2016-06-14 14:20, Hunt, David:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 14/6/2016 1:55 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > 2016-06-14 10:46, David Hunt:
> >> Until now, the objects stored in a mempool were internally stored in a
> >> ring. This patch introduces the possibility to register external hand
Hi David,
2016-06-14 10:46, David Hunt:
> Until now, the objects stored in a mempool were internally stored in a
> ring. This patch introduces the possibility to register external handlers
> replacing the ring.
>
> The default behavior remains unchanged, but calling the new function
> rte_mempool
Hi Thomas,
On 14/6/2016 1:55 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> 2016-06-14 10:46, David Hunt:
>> Until now, the objects stored in a mempool were internally stored in a
>> ring. This patch introduces the possibility to register external handlers
>> replacing the ring.
>>
>> The default beh
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: David Hunt [mailto:david.hunt at intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:16 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: olivier.matz at 6wind.com; viktorin at rehivetech.com;
> jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com; Shreyansh Jain ;
> David Hunt
> Subject: [PATCH v10 1
Until now, the objects stored in a mempool were internally stored in a
ring. This patch introduces the possibility to register external handlers
replacing the ring.
The default behavior remains unchanged, but calling the new function
rte_mempool_set_handler() right after rte_mempool_create_empty()
5 matches
Mail list logo
