[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring

2016-03-15 Thread NĂ©lio Laranjeiro
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:55:38PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Re-spin of the Marc's patchset. > The first version was sent 10 months ago! > There are still too few tests and reviews but it is now time to move > forward with this rework. > Some issues were remaining in v9 and were difficult to

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring

2016-03-15 Thread Matej Vido
D?a 15.03.2016 o 08:12 Thomas Monjalon nap?sal(a): > 2016-03-15 01:04, Matej Vido: >> Hi, >> >> patch http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10202/ >> which was applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 tree changes filling >> of items in rte_eth_link structure for szedata2 driver. These changes >> for szeda

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring

2016-03-15 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-15 01:04, Matej Vido: > Hi, > > patch http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10202/ > which was applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 tree changes filling > of items in rte_eth_link structure for szedata2 driver. These changes > for szedata2 driver are not compliant with changes in this patch se

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring

2016-03-15 Thread Matej Vido
Hi, patch http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10202/ which was applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 tree changes filling of items in rte_eth_link structure for szedata2 driver. These changes for szedata2 driver are not compliant with changes in this patch series. I'm not sure how it should be addres

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API refactoring

2016-03-14 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Re-spin of the Marc's patchset. The first version was sent 10 months ago! There are still too few tests and reviews but it is now time to move forward with this rework. Some issues were remaining in v9 and were difficult to see because it was mainly one big patch. That's why I've split it in severa