On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:55:38PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Re-spin of the Marc's patchset.
> The first version was sent 10 months ago!
> There are still too few tests and reviews but it is now time to move
> forward with this rework.
> Some issues were remaining in v9 and were difficult to
D?a 15.03.2016 o 08:12 Thomas Monjalon nap?sal(a):
> 2016-03-15 01:04, Matej Vido:
>> Hi,
>>
>> patch http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10202/
>> which was applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 tree changes filling
>> of items in rte_eth_link structure for szedata2 driver. These changes
>> for szeda
2016-03-15 01:04, Matej Vido:
> Hi,
>
> patch http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10202/
> which was applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 tree changes filling
> of items in rte_eth_link structure for szedata2 driver. These changes
> for szedata2 driver are not compliant with changes in this patch se
Hi,
patch http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10202/
which was applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 tree changes filling
of items in rte_eth_link structure for szedata2 driver. These changes
for szedata2 driver are not compliant with changes in this patch series.
I'm not sure how it should be addres
Re-spin of the Marc's patchset.
The first version was sent 10 months ago!
There are still too few tests and reviews but it is now time to move
forward with this rework.
Some issues were remaining in v9 and were difficult to see because it
was mainly one big patch. That's why I've split it in severa
5 matches
Mail list logo