On 17/11/2021 3:55 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
My microphone was not working during the Techboard meeting, so here goes
instead:
Please consider if the default of max 128 assigned lcores suffices for the
expected lifetime of the 21.11 LTS, or if the default should be bumped to 512
as suggested
My microphone was not working during the Techboard meeting, so here goes
instead:
Please consider if the default of max 128 assigned lcores suffices for the
expected lifetime of the 21.11 LTS, or if the default should be bumped to 512
as suggested.
@David Hunt, do you have idea about the memor
On 14/9/2021 12:29 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 1:07 PM David Hunt wrote:
“ERROR: logical core 212 is above the maximum lcore number permitted.
Please use the --lcores option to map lcores onto physical cores, e.g.
--lcores="(0-3)@(212-215).”
If you could directly provid
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 1:07 PM David Hunt wrote:
> >> “ERROR: logical core 212 is above the maximum lcore number permitted.
> >> Please use the --lcores option to map lcores onto physical cores, e.g.
> >> --lcores="(0-3)@(212-215).”
> > If you could directly provide the right --lcores syntax base
On 14/9/2021 11:00 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:34 AM David Hunt wrote:
On 10/9/2021 9:24 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
10/09/2021 10:06, David Marchand:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:54 AM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:51:04AM +0200, David Marchand
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:34 AM David Hunt wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/2021 9:24 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 10/09/2021 10:06, David Marchand:
> >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:54 AM Bruce Richardson
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:51:04AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9,
On 10/9/2021 9:24 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
10/09/2021 10:06, David Marchand:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:54 AM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:51:04AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:38 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:45:06PM
10/09/2021 10:06, David Marchand:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:54 AM Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:51:04AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:38 PM Bruce Richardson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:45:06PM +0100, David
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:54 AM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:51:04AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:38 PM Bruce Richardson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:45:06PM +0100, David Hunt wrote:
> > > > Modern processors are coming w
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:51:04AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:38 PM Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:45:06PM +0100, David Hunt wrote:
> > > Modern processors are coming with an ever increasing number of cores,
> > > and 128 does not seem lik
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:38 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:45:06PM +0100, David Hunt wrote:
> > Modern processors are coming with an ever increasing number of cores,
> > and 128 does not seem like a sensible max limit any more, especially
> > when you consider multi-sock
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:45:06PM +0100, David Hunt wrote:
> Modern processors are coming with an ever increasing number of cores,
> and 128 does not seem like a sensible max limit any more, especially
> when you consider multi-socket systems with Hyper-Threading enabled.
>
> This patch increases
Modern processors are coming with an ever increasing number of cores,
and 128 does not seem like a sensible max limit any more, especially
when you consider multi-socket systems with Hyper-Threading enabled.
This patch increases max_lcores default from 128 to 512.
Signed-off-by: David Hunt
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
