On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:40:46AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> > I can't apply patch 0001-... , could You check it please?
>
> I generated it from a rebase of my own copy of DPDK against DPDK upstream
> master.
>
> So I'm not sure why it would not apply against latest DPDK master.
>
> But I w
Hi Michal,
Try patch below. I will send it via git.
Regards,
Vladimir
2015-10-26 21:40 GMT+03:00 Matthew Hall :
> > I can't apply patch 0001-... , could You check it please?
>
> I generated it from a rebase of my own copy of DPDK against DPDK upstream
> master.
>
> So I'm not sure why it would
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin
---
config/common_bsdapp | 1 +
config/common_linuxapp | 1 +
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 194 +--
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 163 +++
4 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 140
uint8_t next_hop;
>};
> };
>
> struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry {
>uint8_t depth :6;
>uint8_t valid_group :1;
>uint8_t valid :1;
>uint8_t next_hop;
> };
> #endif
>
> /** @internal Rule structure. */
> struct rte_lp
t intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:55 PM
> > To: Vladimir Medvedkin
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] lpm: increase number of next hops
> > for lpm (ipv4)
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 08:52:04PM +0300, Vladimir Medvedkin wrote:
> &g
/rte_lpm.h:81
error: lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h: patch does not apply
> 2015-10-26 14:57 GMT+03:00 Jastrzebski, MichalX K <
> michalx.k.jastrzebski at intel.com>:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michal Jastrzebski [mailto:michalx.k.jastrzebski at intel.com]
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall at mhcomputing.net]
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 8:10 AM
> To: Jastrzebski, MichalX K; Kobylinski, MichalX
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] lpm: increase number of next hops
> f
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Jastrzebski [mailto:michalx.k.jastrzebski at intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:55 PM
> To: Vladimir Medvedkin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] lpm: increase number of next hops
> for lpm (ipv4)
>
> On Sun, Oc
> I can't apply patch 0001-... , could You check it please?
I generated it from a rebase of my own copy of DPDK against DPDK upstream
master.
So I'm not sure why it would not apply against latest DPDK master.
But I will try it and see what could be the reason.
Matthew.
Hi all,
Here my implementation
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin
---
config/common_bsdapp | 1 +
config/common_linuxapp | 1 +
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 194
+--
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 163 +++
4 file
On 10/23/15 9:20 AM, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:51:48PM +0200, Michal Jastrzebski wrote:
>> From: Michal Kobylinski
>>
>> The current DPDK implementation for LPM for IPv4 and IPv6 limits the
>> number of next hops to 256, as the next hop ID is an 8-bit long field.
>> Propose
Hi all,
I also have LPM library implementation. Main points:
- First, we don't need two separate structures rte_lpm_tbl8_entry and
rte_lpm_tbl24_entry. I think it's better to merge in one rte_lpm_tbl_entry
because there is only one difference in name of one bit - valid_group vs
ext_entry. Let it's
From: Michal Kobylinski
The current DPDK implementation for LPM for IPv4 and IPv6 limits the
number of next hops to 256, as the next hop ID is an 8-bit long field.
Proposed extension increase number of next hops for IPv4 to 2^24 and
also allows 32-bits read/write operations.
This patchset requi
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:33:05AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:20:33 -0700
> Matthew Hall wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:51:48PM +0200, Michal Jastrzebski wrote:
> > > From: Michal Kobylinski
> > >
> > > The current DPDK implementation for LPM for IPv4 and
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:20:33 -0700
Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:51:48PM +0200, Michal Jastrzebski wrote:
> > From: Michal Kobylinski
> >
> > The current DPDK implementation for LPM for IPv4 and IPv6 limits the
> > number of next hops to 256, as the next hop ID is an 8-bit l
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:51:48PM +0200, Michal Jastrzebski wrote:
> From: Michal Kobylinski
>
> The current DPDK implementation for LPM for IPv4 and IPv6 limits the
> number of next hops to 256, as the next hop ID is an 8-bit long field.
> Proposed extension increase number of next hops for IP
17 matches
Mail list logo
