Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] bbdev: adding explicit enum for code block mode

Hi Nicolas, > Hi Akhil, > Any chance to review this one to be applied? > Thanks > Applied to dpdk-next-crypto Thanks Please note that my email Id has changed.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] bbdev: adding explicit enum for code block mode

Hi Akhil, Any chance to review this one to be applied? Thanks > -Original Message- > From: Tom Rix > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:04 PM > To: Chautru, Nicolas ; dev@dpdk.org; > akhil.go...@nxp.com; tho...@monjalon.net > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bbdev: adding explicit enum for code bl

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] bbdev: adding explicit enum for code block mode

On 2/19/21 4:15 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote: > Using explicit enum instead of ambiguous integer value > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru > --- > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 16 - > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c | 16 - > drivers/baseba

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] bbdev: adding explicit enum for code block mode

Using explicit enum instead of ambiguous integer value Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru --- app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 16 - app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c | 16 - drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 42 +++-

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] bbdev: adding explicit enum for code block mode

Minor change suggested by Tom Rix in earlier review. Avoiding magic number for code_block_mode and use explicit enum at bbdev level. PMDs updated in same commit. Nicolas Chautru (1): bbdev: adding explicit enum for code block mode app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 16 --