lease guide with the
next steps.
--
Regards,
Souvik
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PA
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 22:43:54 +
"Dey, Souvik" wrote:
> Hi ,
> Currently as you have mentioned, I have changed the code to:
> static int
> virtio_mtu_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
> {
> struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
> - if (unlikely(mtu < (uint32_t)
Saturday, August 27, 2016 8:16 PM
To: Dey, Souvik
Cc: huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] add mtu set in virtio
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:54:28 -0400
souvikdey33 wrote:
> This functionality is required mostly in the cloud in
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:54:28 -0400
souvikdey33 wrote:
> This functionality is required mostly in the cloud infrastructure.
> For example, if we use gre or vxlan network between compute and
> controller, then we should not use 1500 mtu in the guest as with
> encapsulation the sixe of the packet wi
This functionality is required mostly in the cloud infrastructure.
For example, if we use gre or vxlan network between compute and
controller, then we should not use 1500 mtu in the guest as with
encapsulation the sixe of the packet will be more and will get
dropped in the infrastructure. So, in t
5 matches
Mail list logo