On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:34 AM Kinsella, Ray wrote:
>
> From ABI PoV, you are 100%.
>
> Is the agreed term 'callback'?, not 'notifier' for example
> rte_dev_event_callback_register, rte_mem_event_callback_register
>
> I did wonder however, if all these cb's would be better handled through a
>
From ABIĀ PoV, you are 100%.
Is the agreed term 'callback'?, not 'notifier' for example
rte_dev_event_callback_register, rte_mem_event_callback_register
I did wonder however, if all these cb's would be better handled through a
EventDev event notification style approach.
Ray K
On 10/06/2020 15
Now that lcores can be dynamically allocated/freed, we will have to
notify DPDK components and applications of such events for cases where
per lcore context must be allocated/initialised.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c | 91 +++
li
3 matches
Mail list logo